“
Introduction: When the shade under the big tree is no longer hospitable, but barren instead
In the tech world, there is a fear known as ‘being targeted by Apple.’ If you develop a hit third-party app, don’t rush to pop the champagne, because Apple might just ‘build-in’ a function identical to yours in the next system update. This is the infamous ‘Sherlocking’ phenomenon. Recently, Reincubate, the developer of the well-known webcam software Camo, finally reached its breaking point and officially filed a lawsuit against Apple, alleging that the ‘Continuity Camera’ feature involves anti-competitive behavior and patent infringement. This legal battle of David vs. Goliath has once again sparked heated discussions about ‘Walled Garden’ monopoly controversies.
The Origin: From Partner to ‘Usurper’
Reincubate’s Camo app has long been a lifesaver for many remote workers. In an era where laptop webcams were still stuck at 720p, Camo allowed users to easily turn their iPhones into high-definition webcams. However, in macOS Ventura released in 2022, Apple introduced ‘Continuity Camera’ with great fanfare, offering features almost identical to Camo. Since it is native system support, its stability and convenience are naturally superior.According to the lawsuit filed by Reincubate, they believe Apple’s actions are not just a technical ‘homage,’ but an act of harvesting the leeks using platform hegemony. Here are the key points of the case:
- Patent Infringement Allegations: Reincubate claims Apple used several core technologies they developed without authorization.
- Anti-competitive Behavior: Using system-level permissions to exclude competition for third-party developers, causing software that originally required payment or download to lose its market value instantly.
- CEO’s Bold Response: Reincubate’s CEO stated: ‘We aren’t trying to block the connection between Apple and its users; we want to challenge Apple’s airtight \”Walled Garden\”.’
Deep Dive: What is ‘Sherlocking’?
To the general public, the term ‘Sherlocking’ might be unfamiliar. It dates back to the 90s when there was a search software called Watson. Apple subsequently released a system search tool, Sherlock 2, with almost the same functions. Since then, whenever Apple ‘incorporates’ a third party’s creativity and builds it into the system, people jokingly say the software has been ‘Sherlocked.’In tech circles, this is often described as ‘predatory behavior’. Although Apple claims it’s to improve user experience and make system functions more complete, for small companies that have invested heavily in R&D, this is undoubtedly an ambush that cuts off their livelihood.
Tech Review: Is Apple’s ‘Continuity’ Innovation or Bullying?
This lawsuit is worth paying attention to because it hits the most sensitive nerve of tech giants: platform monopoly. Here are a few observations and reviews of this event:
- The Developer’s Dilemma: Developing in the iOS or macOS ecosystem has the advantage of a large user base and strong spending power—it’s like ‘enjoying the shade under a big tree.’ But the downside is that once your creativity is too outstanding, it’s easy for Apple to notice and directly incorporate it, making it ‘no grass grows under the big tree.’
- The Tug-of-War for User Experience: From a consumer’s perspective, built-in features are usually smoother and more integrated. But if competition is lacking, will Apple lose the motivation to keep improving? This is why we need companies like Reincubate who are willing to stand up against the system.
- Vague Legal Boundaries: Similarity in software functionality is actually very hard to define legally. Apple can argue it’s an inevitable trend of technological progress, while Reincubate must present solid patent evidence to prove Apple indeed ‘copied the homework’ too blatantly.
Conclusion: This Lawsuit Will Become a Bellwether
As the saying goes, ‘When gods fight, mortals suffer,’ but if Reincubate can achieve a phased victory in this lawsuit, it might win more survival space for independent developers at large. For Apple, how to find a balance between ‘optimizing system experience’ and ‘respecting developer creativity’ will be an unavoidable topic when facing antitrust investigations.This legal battle has just begun. Will it end in a settlement or evolve into a verdict that changes the industry ecosystem? We will continue to track this for everyone. In this creepy and thought-provoking tech jungle, continuous innovation might be the only way to survive.
What do you think? Do you think Apple is ‘optimizing the experience’ or ‘lacking sportsmanship’? Feel free to leave a comment below to share your thoughts!”
